Monday 28/11/16 class. To read article and blog.
Does Technology Improve Learning – The Value of Constructivist Approaches to Technology-Based Learning? (2016) by Allsop.
This interesting article focuses on the constructivist approach, in the inclusion of technology being used in education.
‘Constructivism is a learning theory that focuses on knowledge and explores how people learn’ (Allsop, 2016). This approach has been focused on by many theorists:
Manus (1960) suggests that ‘through interactions and experiences’ a significance is created and meaning is developed.
Piaget (1970) children will be ‘motivated by their own desire to make sense of their world,’ therefore through active learning, playful interactions and new knowledge can be constructed, through ‘supporting children when they need it and guiding them to take control of their self-directed learning experience.’ Collins & O’Brien (2003, cited in Edwards, 2015) and Niemi & Nevgi (2014, cited in Aksit et al, 2016) both discuss the influential aspects of active learning, which encourages philosophical processing and questioning.
Providing this support where required, is simiarly following the approach of Vygotsky’s (1978) Zone of Proximal Development.
Dewey (1938) suggests that ‘knowledge occurs only from situations in which learners have to draw out of meaningful experiences,’ which are engaging through community of enquiry with creative thinking and philosophical questioning (Fisher, 2013).
Bruner (1960) proposes that through individual learning and ‘discovering the knowledge on their own,’ children are able to process through the three stages of representation: enactive, iconic and symbolic.
Papert (1991) ‘suggests that schools are well behind the rapidly changing society which is deeply shaped by changes in technology.’ Therefore, to increase the level of engagement in learning, Papert (1991) developed Logo Language; which ‘provided opportunities for learners to experience collaboration, visualisation, simulation and programming […] Logo Turtle, a small robot’ […] through solving problems could ‘strengthen children’s ability to learn knowledge.’
This is the first time I have read about Papert and Logo Language, so I decided to look further into it and have a go myself. Looking at Logo (Transum, 2016), took me a while to understand the instructions and realise what I had to do.
Click here to see my first attempt.
So can technology enhance the learning experience?
Dewey (1938, cited in Allsop, 2016) ‘believes that education should not stop in classrooms but extend to life out of schools; by using computers visually, auditorily and actively […] can had a positive effect on attitudes because they feel more successful, are motivated to learn and have better confidence.’
Having access to a wider variety of resources, working collaboratively and interactively, child-driven, and engaging more with topical information through a different medium to typical learning instructions, can ‘develop more complex thinking skills.’
Using technology in this way, creates a portfolio of work, which can enhance children’s learning, as well as the planning process. Activities can be planned ‘according to individual learner’s needs and interests which will motivate the learners to learn.’
Journal Available at:
http://www.ictinpractice.com/does-technology-improve-learning-the-value-of-constructivist-approaches-to-technology-based-learning/
*************************************
Transum (2016) Online Logo. Available at: http://www.transum.org/software/Logo/ (Accessed: 01/12/16).
Edwards, S. (2015) Active Learning in the Middle Grades. Middle School Journal. 46(5) pp26-32. http://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1059827
Allsop (2016) Does Technology Improve Learning – The Value of Constructivist Approaches to Technology-Based Learning? Available at: http://www.ictinpractice.com/does-technology-improve-learning-the-value-of-constructivist-approaches-to-technology-based-learning/ (Accessed: 28/11/16).
Aksit, F., Niemi, H. & Nevgi, A. (2016) Why is active learning so difficult to implement: The turkish case. Australian Journal of Teacher Education. 41(4) Available at: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,athens&db=eric&AN=EJ1098142&site=eds-live
Vygotsky, L.S. (1978) Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, Mass; London: Harvard University Press.
Fisher, R. (2013) Teaching Thinking: Philosophical Enquiry in the Classroom. (4th edition.) London: Bloomsbury Academic.
Bruner, J. (1960) The Process of Education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.