University of Roehampton
Introduction to Public Health and Health Promotion
Nursing Programmes (Dept. of Life Sciences)
Group Presentations 6th and 8th June 2023 09.30-12.30
This form is for consideration of a live/face to face presentation by groups of
students and for a submitted Power Point Presentation.
Student Names Jeanette, Natalie, Olufunmilayo, Promise and Patrick.
Group Name 9
Module Name Introduction to Public Health and Health Promotion
Module Code NRS020C1035
Assignment title Group Project Presentation
Date of Submission 06/06/2023
Word Count N/A
Please consider whether the groups have included, NOT
included or partially included all of the requested work in
their group presentations. See marking criteria below.
Presentation Criteria Comments
1. Local area chosen with rationale. Including
demographics, socioeconomic factors and
health and wellbeing patterns. What are the
key determinants of health, illness and
wellbeing in this area?
(20 marks) 9
Brent, see below box for other
commentary.
2. Identify a health priority to focus on with
rationale, explored in depth
Identify common health inequalities and the
underlying reasons within this area and the
target group.
(20 marks) 8
Increased
teenage
pregnancy
rates.
Covered
poverty,
unemployment,
ONS data.
BAME groups,
Identified
educational
strategies. –
strategic
evaluation.
3. Identify a health promotion or public health
strategy to address the need. Explain why
this method has been chosen. Discuss the
approach to the strategy and how this can
be tailored to the specific individuals or
group identified.
(20 marks) 9
Speaks on current strategies to
manage TP in Brent-1988, to reduce in
the whole of the UK and therefore
Brent.
Causes of TP.
Increase full time education and
communicating with new teenage
parents.
4. Explain how the planning and delivery may
include service users, practice partners and
additional charities/groups if appropriate.
(20 marks) 8
Parents/Service users/Schools/social
media/Excluded from school.
5. Suggest how this project might be
evaluated.
(5 marks) 2
No mention of managing impact or
outcomes, effectiveness.
Requesting feedback after each art
and crafts session. Spoke of idle
minds. Arts and crafts to prevent
teenage pregnancy- write to the local
authorities- to find a venue.
6. Is presentation clear and easy to
understand, making appropriate use of
technology (power point). Is there a clear
structure? Is language appropriate and
fluent? Did the presentation take 20 minutes
to complete?
(5 marks) 2
PDF used.
Shows graphs from 2018 (ONS).
Patrick turned back on the audience.
7. Is there evidence of collaborative group
work with an equal contribution from each
group member?
(5 marks) 2
Not as smooth as other groups.
1 person (Olu) more of a
spokesperson.
Patrick also spoke up.
Jeanette- grew up in Brent, spoke of
activities in the local community
centers. Knife crime changed
everything- to offer more cooking
classes, aerobics and other activities.
8. Is there evidence of appropriate academic
style – supporting data, references cited,
structure, & grammar
(5 marks) 2
Some older data used. Have this group
looked a more updated data.
Referencing does not follow
guidelines.
Mark: 42%
Feedback from marker:
Knowledge and understanding, both verbal and written.
Poor evidence of up-to-date research around the health needs in Brent.
Data from the 1990s and early 2000s to provide the demographic and community profile.
Discussion and analysis, both verbal and written.
Covered what had been covered historically and nationally in Brent.
Referenced up to 2018- just too old.
The UK has the highest rates of TP in Europe- there will be more recent data than this to
present.
No mention of sexual health or contraception advice despite the health need identified.
Education strategy was carried out in Brent already.
Further detail around peer support or online support could have improved the
presentation.
Summary
The presentation met the threshold level of attainment of the learning outcomes has been
achieved.
The presentation was somewhat paternalistic. There was no evidence of how coproduction would take place with the client group. No clear evidence of how you would
evaluate the impact of the strategy which was historical anyway-you need to have thought
of an original idea.
Where is the evidence to say that activities for young people will reduce the numbers of
teenage pregnancies?
You will need to present a picture of health promotion intervention.
Missed opportunity to include partner agencies in the strategies.
Missed opportunity around a lack of curiosity about current data.
How will the audience consider relevance to the subject from older more historical data?
The group worked well together- good joined up thinking between the group. Good
consensus, so evidenced good all-round agreement.
Feed forward:
Please review cite them right as you have not followed the guidance correctly.
Assure evidence and data used is as up to date and current as possible.
Utilize the learning outcomes and marking criteria to help with organization and
discussion.
Marker name: Paulette Ragan
Date:06/06/2023
Feedback from Service Users/Carers (if appropriate)
You found the data needed – but consider the quality, age and relevance of that data.
Service Users/Carers name: Jacqueline Ewers
Date:06/06/2023
Moderator comments
Agree with comments above and grade given.
Date: 11/06/23 Beverley Brathwaite
100
92
85
Upper First – Work graded in this range demonstrates…
• Achievement beyond the attainment of intended learnin
Feedback:Y1
Reply