Inequalities and Political Engagement

Source: theguardian.com

There are many inferences and interpretations relating to the variations of political engagement, with ideas of disengagement occurring in consequence of individual citizens failing to live up to their democratic obligations, as well as the way in which socioeconomic structures in society may prevent particular people from participating in democracy fully and on an equal basis. Nonetheless it is to be identified regardless of such causes of differing engagement levels, groups that occupy a higher level of participation will also occupy a higher level of influence (Uberoi and Johnston, 2021).

Where do inequalities regarding political engagement stem?

Although there are no preventions disallowing people from engaging in politics except age, it can be argued there are underlying deterrents which may hinder people as a result of feeling like ‘it is not for them’. Ultimately the UK, in effect, namely occupies a democracy in which is argued, allows all citizens to have a voice in decisions that would effect all (Scott and Marshall, 2014). As such as Lawrence (2015) highlights if certain groups, individuals or classes dominate the process, or others are not effectively considered, democracy is undermined.

Arguably, it may be noted, in my own opinion, looking at the state of political engagement within the UK, democracy has already and is continuously being undermined. There are various reasons for this, particularly a lack of representation of members of the public from underprivileged communities, long-standing socioeconomic inequalities in voice and power, distrust and feelings of alienation from politicians and the elite.

In a report conducted by the Institute for Public Policy Research (IPPR) in 2014 they highlighted political inequality as being the case of certain individuals or groups having greater influence over political decision-making, subsequently benefiting from unequal outcomes through those decisions, despite procedural equality in the democratic process (Uberoi and Johnston, 2021).

Lack of Representation

Source: parliament.uk

A key factor which contributes to the inequalities experienced by those attributed with the title of less privileged, may formulate in result of the lack of representation in the Houses of Parliament, where many MPs and certainly the overwhelming majority, are of white heritage with backgrounds of privilege, high status and financial supremacy. A standard of living very different to the masses in which they are attempting to appeal, thus, a division occurs further promoting disengagement where ordinary people become isolated and estranged from the political system. Various forms of inequalities may be categorised under a lack of representation leading to political disengagement.

For instance research conducted by the house of commons highlights categories of age, gender, social grade and ethnicity as contributing factors of disengagement and inequality. Firstly, age; where young people are less likely to register to vote, vote, and be elected, although older people tend to have more negative attitudes towards politics, additionally the average age of councillors, MPs and candidates is over 50. Secondly, gender; as a result of an unbalanced ratio of women to men in parliament, where women are underrepresented, they tend to have a negative attitude towards politics compared to men. Although research suggests women and men are both as equally likely to register to vote and usually vote, however they were less likely to vote at the 2019 general election. Thirdly, social grade; evidence suggests unskilled workers and the long-term unemployed are more politically disengaged than people from other occupational backgrounds. Lastly, ethnicity; where people of minority ethnic backgrounds are less likely to be registered to vote, vote and be elected. In comparison people from white groups are more likely to have negative attitudes to politics and participate less in political activities (Uberoi and Johnston, 2021).

Unbalances in various groups regarding political engagement in consequence of inequality

Source: British Election Study, face to face survey, 2015, 2017 & 2019

The bar chart on the left shows the differences in engagement among white and ethnic groups, with white groups having greater engagement. Research suggests those from ethnic minority backgrounds are generally less likely to vote than their white counterparts. This may be in consequence of many factors, although significantly reasoning for minorities not voting is ironically due to being minorities. As they do not see a representation or appeal from parties to them, the better option is not vote at all in some occasions, thus a vicious cycle manifests where inequalities are concurrent and reproduced. Nonetheless, it is helpful to note a party in which historically attracts minorities is the Labour Party, demonstrating they take some steps in appealing a demographic (Uberoi and Johnston).

Source: Ipsos Mori, Social grade: a classification tool, 2009

 

Another category which relates to inequality and political engagement under the classification of socioeconomic groups, can be assessed through the use of the proxy ‘social grade’, which captures the dimensions of income, housing, profession and level of education.

 

The table above demonstrates the grades, in some cases they may be grouped together in which the chart below demonstrates.

Source: Hansard Society, Audit of Political Engagement 2019

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Research suggests those from unemployed backgrounds or of low skill are more likely to have negative attitudes towards politics and politicians and thus reluctant to get involved and vote. This permeates an entrenching of existing inequalities, where such citizens reluctant to get involved may be unable to get involved as a result of lack of skills, finances, exposure and resources. Therefore, it can be argued that in order to entice them to engage, steps of exposure, adequate resources and educational development must be put in place.

Thank you for reading my blog, I hope you’ve been able to learn something new, feel free to leave a comment!

 

 

 

 

References:

Lawrence, M. (2015). Political inequality: Why British democracy must be reformed and revitalised. [PDF] Institute for Public Policy Research- IPPR. Available at: https://www.ippr.org/files/publications/pdf/political-inequality_Apr2015.pdf (Accessed 11/03/21).

Scott, J and Marshall, G (2014). A dictionary of sociology. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press

Uberoi, E. and Johnston, N., 2021. Political disengagement in the UK: who is disengaged?. [online] Available at: <https://researchbriefings.files.parliament.uk/documents/CBP-7501/CBP-7501.pdf> [Accessed 12 March 2022].

 

3 Responses

  1. Sumeya Mohamud says:

    Hi Rahene, I found this very interesting to read for various reasons.

    I enjoyed how you highlighted the different inequalities that impacts on an individuals political engagement. Although we all may have the right to vote we don’t all start off at the same place. Some people’s political engagement is determined by their ethnicity, social grade, gender or age. I believe the lack of representation within the political sphere impacts heavily on the publics engagement in politics especially for young voters. You mentioned that the average age for MPs and candidates is over 50. I believe this can create a divide as many young people like myself feel we are already unheard and underrepresented in politics. Young people often get the short end of the stick because we are the ones who will inherit a world that has to deal with the repercussions of environmental, social, and economic policies made by people who do not represent us or our concerns.

    I also thought the data you’ve used supported your argument well as it really illustrated a clear view of the disparity within political engagement. Do you think this level of inequality with political engagement will improve with the many incentives being introduced or will this get worse given the current political climate?

    • Rahane Miah says:

      Thank you for your response! I appreciate your feedback and in answer to your question I would say the incentives put in place may certainly affect the political engagement in a positive light, however as far as inequality within representation in itself in terms of those parties who are aiming to gain votes, this can only develop when such parties adapt to the need for a more diverse set of representatives.

  2. Hajar Chakour says:

    Hey Rahane, I found this blog to be a very interesting read and I agree with much of what you have written. I think it is very important to acknowledge the intersecting inequalities of age, gender and socioeconomic background not only in wider society but especially those within our own government – the very people who are supposed to represent us. I also found it surprising when you mentioned that the average age of MPs and councillors is over 50, this together with the majority being males and white could partially explain why young people, especially women of colour like myself, feel so disconnected from politics as the political sphere just does not look like the world around us. I wanted to ask whether you think implementing quotas like the one that addresses the issue of gender inequality would be beneficial for other inequalities too or are there other alternatives that you think could effectively tackle this? Overall I found this blog to be very insightful and well written in a way that clearly shows all the obstacles to be overcome before we reach political equality in the UK.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *